<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R Appears Among Top 20 Programming Languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confounding.net/2012/01/24/r-appears-among-top-20-programming-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confounding.net/2012/01/24/r-appears-among-top-20-programming-languages/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Wicklin</title>
		<link>http://confounding.net/2012/01/24/r-appears-among-top-20-programming-languages/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Wicklin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confounding.net/?p=271#comment-549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The way this index is assembled ... seems a decent aggregate measure.&quot;

Last year I wrote an article that argues against using &quot;search engine hits&quot; as a proxy for &quot;popularity.&quot;  My conclusion is that, statistically speaking, it&#039;s not a good measure. Although I don&#039;t address the Tiobe rankings, several comments bring them up. See http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/08/19/estimating-popularity-based-on-google-searches-why-its-a-bad-idea/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The way this index is assembled &#8230; seems a decent aggregate measure.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last year I wrote an article that argues against using &#8220;search engine hits&#8221; as a proxy for &#8220;popularity.&#8221;  My conclusion is that, statistically speaking, it&#8217;s not a good measure. Although I don&#8217;t address the Tiobe rankings, several comments bring them up. See <a href="http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/08/19/estimating-popularity-based-on-google-searches-why-its-a-bad-idea/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/08/19/estimating-popularity-based-on-google-searches-why-its-a-bad-idea/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
