<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autism, Vaccines, and Shifting Goalposts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confounding.net/2009/06/08/autism-vaccines-and-shifting-goalposts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confounding.net/2009/06/08/autism-vaccines-and-shifting-goalposts/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://confounding.net/2009/06/08/autism-vaccines-and-shifting-goalposts/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confoundingblog.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An observational dose-response study would be doable. Some kids get vaccinated more than others, so they could look at the relationship between number of vaccines and developmental outcomes. 

It&#039;s not perfect, like an RCT, but the socio-economic and cultural confounds could be controlled for by blindly screening the children for ASD (rather than relying on diagnoses sought by the parents.) It would not be possible to control for biological or environmental confounds too easily.

The current anti-vaxer hypothesis is &quot;too many - too soon,&quot; so a dose-response study should be more than adequate to test it. It&#039;s not &quot;one vaccine is just as likely to cause autism as 10 vaccines.&quot; So a fully-unvaccinated vs. vaccinated study is clearly not necessary. Though that will likely be the first excuse in the event  the study is negative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An observational dose-response study would be doable. Some kids get vaccinated more than others, so they could look at the relationship between number of vaccines and developmental outcomes. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not perfect, like an RCT, but the socio-economic and cultural confounds could be controlled for by blindly screening the children for ASD (rather than relying on diagnoses sought by the parents.) It would not be possible to control for biological or environmental confounds too easily.</p>
<p>The current anti-vaxer hypothesis is &#8220;too many &#8211; too soon,&#8221; so a dose-response study should be more than adequate to test it. It&#8217;s not &#8220;one vaccine is just as likely to cause autism as 10 vaccines.&#8221; So a fully-unvaccinated vs. vaccinated study is clearly not necessary. Though that will likely be the first excuse in the event  the study is negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
